XLM Product Performance Dashboard

Executive Overview

Product Performance Score Trend All quarters
Score Breakdown
β€”
/100
Engagementβ€”
Sentimentβ€”
Satisfactionβ€”
PPS Formula:
(EngagementΓ—0.6)Γ—Sentiment
Γ—Satisfaction β€” Normalized 0–100
Performance Scores Over Time
Revenue Trend $ in Millions
Business Risk
10
Customers
Highβ€”
Medβ€”
Lowβ€”
Gap vs OT
10
Customers
>15%β€”
5–15%β€”
<5%β€”
Quarter Highlights
Customer Performance Overview
Customer ↕ Quarter ↕ Revenue ↕ PPS (0–100) ↕ Build ↕ Simulation ↕ Engagement ↕ Sentiment ↕ Satisfaction ↕ Gap vs OT ↕ Risk ↕
Note: Scores averaged from weekly data. PPS = (EngagementΓ—0.6)Γ—SentimentΓ—Satisfaction (Normalized 0–100)
Quarter-over-Quarter Summary β–Ά = current quarter | β–· = compare quarter
QuarterRevenue ($M)PPSEngagementSentimentSatisfactionBuildSimulationGap vs OT
Revenue by Quarter
PPS vs Engagement Over Time
Filter by Risk:
All
High
Medium
Low
Customer Detail
CustomerRevenuePPSBuildSimulationEngagementSentimentSatisfactionGap vs OTRisk
Revenue by Customer
Build Performance Trend
Simulation Performance Trend
Build vs Simulation by Customer
Engagement Score Trend
Sentiment & Satisfaction Trend
Engagement by Customer
PPS Trend (All Quarters)
PPS by Customer
Business Risk Distribution
Gap vs OT by Customer
Revenue Trend (All Quarters)
Revenue by Customer
βœ… Highlights β€” Good
⚠️ Lowlights β€” Bad
πŸ”΅ Awareness β€” Neutral
Quarter:
All
Q1'24
Q2'24
Q3'24
Q4'24
Q1'25
Q2'25
Q3'25
Q4'25
Customer:
Raw Weekly Data
QuarterWeekCustomerRevenuePPSBuildSimEngagementSentimentSatisfactionGap vs OTRisk
Metric Definitions
Core Scores
Product Performance Score (PPS)
Weighted composite: (EngagementΓ—0.6)Γ—SentimentΓ—Satisfaction, normalized 0–100.
Engagement Score (0–100)
Customer interaction and product usage level. 100 = maximum engagement.
Sentiment Score (βˆ’5 to +5)
Customer feedback sentiment. Positive = favorable attitude toward product.
Satisfaction Score (βˆ’5 to +5)
Overall satisfaction with quality and support. Positive = satisfied.
Quality & Risk
Build Performance (0–100)
Quality of product build process. Higher = fewer build issues.
Simulation Performance (0–100)
Accuracy and efficiency of simulation runs. Higher = better outcomes.
Gap vs OT (%)
Deviation from on-time targets. <5% = Low risk, 5–15% = Medium, >15% = High.
Overall Business Risk
Composite rating (High / Medium / Low) derived from Gap vs OT and engagement.